The effort to enhance health in the United States have been assessed based on the health care system at the central element of health care results.
Nevertheless, there has been some recognition that has played an essential role in changing the health care status in the country. Various factors need to be addressed some as economic, environmental and social issues have to be addressed. This paper presents social determinants of the health condition in the US as well as how to fix them. Solving social determinants of health is essential in enhancing health condition in states. Even though health care is critical to health, it is a very weak determinant of health. Scholars have indicated that health behaviors, these behaviors such as taking alcohol and smoking. The nation has become more concern about social, economic elements that have affected an individual ability to contribute to health conducts. For instance, children who are born to parents who can go to high school, there is a high chance that they will live in the environment that do not have basic needs. Individuals of poor quality houses are garbage exposed. Another issue affected that affect health care inequality is racial discrimination.
There is no significant relationship between social, economic status and health care disparity.
What is the effect of social, economic status on health care disparity?
To determine the relationship between social, economic status and health care disparity
The issue of health care equality has been the topic of discussion in the past few decades in the United States and other parts of the world. The health care disparities in the US in most cases have been based on racial or ethnic background (Betancourt et al., 2016). Some people have stated that discrimination has played an imperative role in widening the gap in health care disparity. It can be noted that the call for the supplement that increased the focus and outlines the social, economic condition as well as geographical location. The UK on the tradition the term inequality has been explained the health care difference between individuals that defined on the social, economic status.
It is important to note that social element and discrimination help is shaping health care in the country. Racism and inequitable distribution of resource have resulted in reduced health care services to some individuals while rich people can access quality health care in anytime they want. In this case, the dominant race can access quality health care which is not the case to the minority group. It has led to a deep root problem that has gone from one generation to another.
Based on the Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health viewpoint, the author indicated that the collective action has to be taken to solve this issue (Betancourt et al., 2016). The health care inequality is something that has to be assessed comprehensively for a certain period. Several scholars have come up with solutions or recommendation that helps in promoting the health care agenda with the primary goal of making it better.
The health care disparities that exist in the people of color have to addressed seriously; we need to treat each other equally and make sure that we can meet our set goals. In this call, all health care institutions have the responsibility to promote health care equality as well as educating the society on effective health care techniques. According to Perspectives on Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health, there are ways of making the policies and action to enhance health equity among citizens. It is something that we need to join hand and make sure that we problem.
Inequality needs stun actions that can help in reducing the social economy in addition to other biases to make health care affordable. Different factors affect health; these outweighed by the significant effects of the social, economic elements such as culture, economics, political in addition to other factors. It has shaped their lives and conduct. Most of these evidence shows that the set in the WHO on the social health determinants (Krieger et al., 2016).
In this case, the relationship between the social condition and health services, the extent of health disparity as the significant indicator of the effect of the economy, and social difference on the citizen’s lives. Health is an essential cause for concern on the increase in wealth disparities and income level in the society. All the time more, people use health care inequality language to explain the inequality that is not avoidable and might be unfair (Schwendicke et al., 2015).
Two significant issues play an essential role in determining health care disparity. These are overconcentration on health and lifestyle drift. The lifestyle drift helps in describing the tendency in health care provision and emphasizing on the people behavior like drug abuse, diet, smoking that are the primary cause of health care issues or disparity, the worse thing is to ignore these drivers.
In most cases, health care is related to wealth. Poor or lack of health care accessibility has become one of the primary debate in the US due to egregious in accessing health care, despite spending more money on health care as compared to other developed nation. The study conducted by the Commonwealth Fund revealed that the US health care system had spent a lot on improving health care services (Cooper et al., 2016). Moreover, the US health care system is poor based on efficiency, cost, equality, etc.
The Veterans Health Administration has improved its focus on equity. The Office of Health Equity has made sure that health care provider for veteran offers equitable care suitable for some circumstance and regardless of the location, ethnicity, race, sexual and age. The universal health care accessibility and focus on reasonable outcomes, this is the main reason for health care inequalities. It is challenging in the social condition that led to health care disparities. Various attempts have to make to allocate health care determinants of a population.
The relationship between health care and health is significant that most people have started to assume that these two factors are the same. It is until the health care stakeholders, and non-health care managers have begun indicating that the government should execute a more effective and efficient action that will help in improving health at the same time minimizing equality using activity outside health care industry (Krueger, 2018). There is a high chance that these difference will continue to crucial.
Behavior and health
In the US there has been a significant increase in emphasis on unhealthy care conduct that negatively affects the provision of health. According to this methodology, some people are responsible for health care disparity (Mirowsky, 2017). These individuals have failed to enhance health by having good conducts, generally drinking sensibly and avoid smoking. Nevertheless, it is essential to understand and improve social determinants of behavior to minimize health disparity at the same time improve health by supporting the existing conducts.
Research Design and Ethical Implications
The study was carried out by reviewing the past literature based on the study topic; this means that the study used both primary and secondary data. The study will assess five peer review papers from different databases. Interviews from the minority communities helped in obtaining primary data. The materials used in this study ranged from 2004 to 2017, with the primary aim of determining factors that affect health care inequality. The articles provided the most comprehensive information about the topic. The research objective is accomplished making this study reliable. Ethical issues were all observed, citing the document information. The author was presented with the document to access the peer review articles for consent.
The analysis of the article indicated that there is a significant relationship between social, economic factors and health care disparity. Race and ethnicity played an imperative role in widening the gap between dominant and minority groups in the nation. It can be noted that the including socioeconomic aspects in the provision in equal accessibility of health care services. The stakeholders will be able to use the study strategies and the implication of policies and the systems that promote health care equality across the country.
The policymakers will use the study findings to implement policies that will help in equal distribution of resources. The rate of discrimination has increased, and this has affected health care accessibility. The equity emphasis in the company policy discussion, allocation of resource, decision making, activities and performance plans for the citizen’s health care. The health care equality in the policy approach that could encompass to other suitable company and stakeholders.
The findings of this study will be beneficial to policymakers and stakeholders in formulating strategies to eliminate discrimination in health care and promoting equality. The study will also help the future researchers to make cite the research and relating their research to this one.
Dissemination of findings:
The study finding will help the community to accept and respect each other’s rights. I intend to share the information from this study with the minority groups across the country, and I hope this will help them to cope with the situation. Health care issues faced today cannot be solved by health care alone. Findings will be shared with the poor with the aim of encouraging them to work hard to meet their set goals and coping with the health care disparity. Knowing issues that affect them plays an imperative role in fighting discrimination.
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Owusu Ananeh-Firempong, I. I. (2016). Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public health reports.
Cooper, R. S., Kennelly, J. F., Durazo-Arvizu, R., Oh, H. J., Kaplan, G., & Lynch, J. (2016).
Relationship between premature mortality and socioeconomic factors in black and white populations of US metropolitan areas. Public health reports.
Krieger, N., Waterman, P. D., Chen, J. T., Soobader, M. J., & Subramanian, S. V. (2016). Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—the public health disparities geocoding project (US). Public health reports.
Krueger, A. B. (2018). Inequality, too much of a good thing. The Inequality Reader (pp. 25-33). Routledge.
Mirowsky, J. (2017). Education, social status, and health. Routledge.
Schwendicke, F., Dörfer, C. E., Schlattmann, P., Page, L. F., Thomson, W. M., & Paris, S. (2015). Socioeconomic inequality and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research, 94(1), 10-18.