Essay about Australian Custom
Payment Under Protest Letter
Dear Customer Service,
On October 17, 2018, I received incorrect items from your online store. Despite my attempts to correct the mistake through the usual online platform, I am yet to receive communication on the refund. The shipped item attracted additional customs duty. According to the terms and conditions in the transaction, your company remains liable in such incidences. The delay in responding to the case through the online platform is the reason for writing to you this letter of protest.
As noted in my email receipt (attached), I purchased safety glass sheets at USD$ 81, 000 inclusive of shipment charges and customs duty. However, the delivered items were different from the requested item thus attracting additional fees. Attached is a copy of the photos as evidence of the different types of products and a complementary list of the items I requested.
I filled up and submitted the online form, but the only reply received from the dispatch department was a proof of shipment receipt. As clearly stated, the contention is not about failure in the shipment department. It is about shipping the wrong set of items. The request was to initiate a reversal process and clearance of associated fees incurred due to the error.
By entering ACER Brand Carbon Steel Music Spring Wire on one entry line, ABF imposed additional charges delaying the delivery process. As a company, the mistake lies with the packaging measures settled on from your end. Therefore, your company should institute immediate punitive measures to avoid a repeat of such cases. Additionally, your company should shoulder the associated charges.
Yours sincerely,
Internal Request for the Review of Tariff Advice Decision
Developing a strong and lasting trade deal is a process that takes time and effort. The approach of fostering such trade deals forms the main issue of debate in the request to review of tariff advise. Creating friendship ties over the internet is as effective as developing the same in a face-to-face setting. However, standing trade principles challenges the practicality of developing positive trade deals on the internet. Based on this assertion, embodied trade deals surpass online interaction, making physical contact a central pillar. The manner in which trade deals are created, nurtured and how they eventually end forms the foundation of their argument.
Different perspectives about the role of the internet and physical interaction in fostering quality trade deals have emerged. There seem to be two conflicting school of thought in this debate. While one party expressing confidence about internet friendship while the other party promotes embodied friendship by discrediting online dealings. Considering the current trend in technology, an online engagement is as good as having a face-to-face interaction. In this submission, proponents affirm the stability of trade deals created online based on their past experiences. One of their strongest point of the argument centers on the ease and comfort of communicating with friends in a different setting. Such trade engagements are free of boredom and misunderstandings relating to shared environments.
However, some online trade deals lack honesty and legitimacy. Their assertions are based on constant reports of fraud committed online. Fostering proper trade deals requires trust, consistency, and time, factors that can only be evaluated through physical interaction. Additionally, most business entities only present to the world their best by avoiding an exposure of some of the most damaging flaws. With such partial representation of their goods and services, it is impossible for one to make a conclusive decision of fostering online engagements.
ABF accords the subject a different perspective. Their support for online trade deals touches on the dynamic nature of socialization in light of technological innovations. The director uses her experience of marrying a man she met online to illustrate the power of such friendships. She affirms the need to accept the social dynamics and embrace alternative platforms for fostering friendships. Through the experience, the director emphasizes the power of virtual trade deals since they ultimately lead to successful embodied engagements.
Marwick, in her support for virtual trade deals, talks about open benefits derived from online trade deals that are lacking in embodied interactions. She points out some success factors in her trade deals like constant communication and intimate trust with the online friend, the now husband. Hughes puts finality to the issue by affirming the degree of success in online trade deals and its contribution to the creation of successful trade deals and marriages. The main point of deliberation on Hughes’s submission centers on the dynamic nature of socialization. He links the concept of globalization as a leading factor in breaking traditional social barriers that ushered in the virtual community.
The agency maintains their reluctance in endorsing virtual trade deals s. Their belief in physical interaction as the ideal foundation in creating trade deals makes them dismiss trade engagements formed virtually as of reduced quality. The system of belief is founded on the difficulty of starting up a conversation with a stranger during the initial interaction. The defense team demonstrates the need to develop a friendship on physical interaction as a precursor for maintaining a logical online trade deal. The perspective points to the difficulty strangers find in opening up about their lives to other strangers.
Additionally, the agency expounded on the challenges of fostering credible trade deals online with dishonesty as the greatest hurdle. For instance, an opportunity to ask for clarifications on a particular topic could be considered rude making it impossible to build a proper communication pillar. The approach is contrary to the traditional face-to-face interaction where people who have once met before can be in a better position to seek more information concerning the other party. The confidence in seeking such information is founded on the social principles of fear and discomfort in trusting others with personal information.
Successful business engagements are founded on the principle of openness and honesty as the foundation of any positive trade deal. Developing such degree of trust based on honesty require physical interaction. It is important to meet a virtual friend face to face to expel any uncertainties that one may have regarding the other person. The persistent fear and uncertainty often come as a result of people presenting themselves on social media different from their real person. The articles identify instances where individuals posted positive attributes and eliminated weaknesses making it impossible to foster a healthy trade deal.
Physical interactions are also essential in giving the parties an opportunity to examine critical non-verbal cues. Creating and maintaining trade deals require connections at critical points. For instance, friends should have united areas of interest. The virtual world can create a falsified representation of such information. With physical interactions, one can easily identify the areas of interest depending on expressions through non-verbal cues like facial expression and tonal variation. The case outlined the strengths and weaknesses of virtually and physically aligned friendships. The articles assisted in bringing out the concept of fostering trade deals from these platforms.
